Overcoming the hurdles of
intellectual property
Intellectual property (IP), such
as brand names, patents, copyrights
or trade secrets, can significantly
contribute to companies’ values. So
it’s important to understand the
nuances of valuing these assets.
Companies may need to know IP’s
value in many different situations.
For instance, a valuation
professional can help a business
considering buying another company
with significant intangible assets
or one that needs to estimate
appropriate royalty rates or
licensing fees to pay an inventor.
And recent accounting standards —
including Statements of Financial
Accounting Standards 141 and 142 —
necessitate IP valuations.
Ins and outs - Several litigation situations
require IP values. Whether faced
with bankruptcy, divorce, a breach
of contract, a dissenting
shareholder suit or an infringed
patent, one can benefit from hiring
an experienced IP valuator. But
before contacting an expert, you
should understand how IP valuations
differ from traditional business
valuation assignments.
IP is hard to get a handle
on - IP is a type of
intangible asset that derives its
value from creative ingenuity or
innovative technology. Unlike hard
assets, intangible assets can’t be
visited or touched.
When valuing IP, a valuator needs
to consider its nature, its
competitive advantages to end-users
and its costs to implement. He or
she should also understand the
company’s legal rights to the IP as
well as the marketplace in which the
company operates.
IP is also subject to a wide
variety of payment methods, ranging
from one-time flat fees and
annual/monthly payments to payments
that vary depending on sales or
gross margins. To complicate
matters, some IP payment terms call
for a combination of fixed and
variable fees or may be subject to
minimum or maximum fees over the
asset’s life.
IP’s complex nature requires the
cooperation of valuation
professionals and technical experts.
Although it can be time consuming,
such collaboration ensures the
valuator truly understands the IP,
so he or she can identify meaningful
comparables and estimate viable cash
flow projections. Although it’s easy
to get caught up in an inventor’s
zeal for his or her discovery, it’s
important that your expert remain
grounded in economic reality,
especially if the IP is not fully
developed.
Attorneys should also educate
valuators about the laws governing
their clients’ IP. These complex
regulations determine the scope of
the IP’s legal protections and can
help identify potential and existing
non-infringing competition. Such
legal knowledge is imperative in
developing royalty rates and cash
flows. But keep in mind that it is
typically outside a valuator’s area
of expertise.
Empirical data on IP is
scarce - Real-life market
evidence is usually the best way to
value IP but, because IP is so
innovative, valuators often have
trouble identifying truly comparable
transactions. Because of IP’s
proprietary nature, the intimate
details of many IP transactions are
also kept secret.
Nonetheless, experienced
valuators have access to commercial
IP databases, and many have
developed their own proprietary
resources from previous consulting
experience. From these databases,
your client’s expert will typically
develop a range of reasonable
royalty rates.
But the multitude of payment
options can make comparing the terms
of comparable transactions and
developing a reasonable range of
royalty rates difficult. After a
valuator has identified a reasonable
range, he or she is likely to employ
a scorecard approach to evaluate the
distinctive characteristics of the
IP, rather than simply applying the
average or median from their ranges.
Even though finding comparables
may be difficult, value conclusions
must be supported with empirical
evidence. Beware of valuators who
rely on anecdotal rules of thumb —
such as an undocumented royalty rate
of 25% of gross margin — except as
sanity checks. These simplistic
measures fail to consider the IP’s
relative technical strengths, market
competition, useful life, or
differences in expense
classifications between companies
and industries.
IP and IP valuations can
quickly become obsolete -
Remember, time can quickly render IP
less valuable or even valueless.
Protective legal rights can expire.
New technology or competition can
enter the marketplace. Economic
conditions and consumer demands can
quickly evolve.
Because IP is so sensitive to
these dynamic variables, another
difficulty valuators face when
valuing IP is estimating the asset’s
remaining useful life. As conditions
change, this estimate can quickly
become outdated. Therefore, market
comparables must be proximate to the
valuation date. Further, IP
valuations should be used only for
their original purpose and “as of”
date.
IP is tricky - For many reasons, IP is different
from other assets. Its nuances
underscore the importance of
timeliness and teamwork among the
valuator, client and attorney. It’s
also imperative that you choose a
business valuator who understands
the specific valuation situation —
whether you’re interested in
strategic decision making, merger
and acquisition considerations,
litigation or income tax/GAAP
financial reporting. We would be
happy to answer your questions about
IP and its implications.
Sidebar: A calculated risk
Intellectual property’s (IP)
higher costs of implementation,
complexity and vulnerability make it
riskier than hard assets such as
receivables, inventory or equipment.
IP’s greater risk often translates
into a higher weighted average cost
of capital or “investment hurdle”
rate. Depending on the IP’s
attributes, applying a company’s
overall cost of capital to its IP
may not make sense.
This is especially true for IP
that is not yet fully developed.
While early-stage IP may have
considerable upside potential, it is
untested and faces many obstacles.
For instance, finalizing the idea
will require additional time and
expense. During the remaining
development time, market conditions
or competitors’ technology may
render the prospective IP obsolete —
before it even has a chance to hit
the market. |